Ukraine: Oligarch provides 'humanitarian aid' to fight Russia
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
As Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine rumbles on, the network of powerful oligarchs in the Russian President’s orbit have increasingly come under scrutiny. Some of the billionaire businessmen said to be close to the Kremlin strongman have been hit with crippling economic sanctions by the West, such as former Chelsea FC boss Roman Abramovich and energy and metals magnate Oleg Deripaska. Although some of Russia’s business elites are allies to Putin, many others have experienced his wrath, such as Kremlin critic Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who was jailed for 10 years in October 2003, just eight months after he confronted Putin at a top-level meeting about corruption.
Khodorkovsky, then Russia’s richest man, accused Putin’s state officials of corruption, before the Russian leader returned the allegation, citing the oligarch’s shady takeover of the Yukos Oil Company as an example.
He later reflected on his battle against Putin and his comments at the oligarchs’ meeting, where he acted as a spokesperson for the businessmen.
Speaking in the BBC’s 2018 documentary ‘Putin: The New Tsar’, he said: “By 2002, the lines had already been crossed.
“Probably, if I’d had a better understanding of the essence of this regime as a criminal organisation, I would have been able to oppose it more effectively.”
The documentary examines Putin’s rise to power and how he has maintained his grip on Russia for the last two decades.
JUST IN: Putin panic over Black Sea sabotage as strategic oil field erupts in flames
A look at the presidency of the former KGB operative shows that Khodorkovsky is far from the only person to dub Putin’s administration a “criminal” regime.
Over the years, he has been widely accused of imprisoning political opponents, and carrying out extrajudicial killings, all while Russia has annexed foreign territory, such as the Crimean Peninsula in 2014.
According to William Pomeranz, an expert on Russian law and deputy director of the Wilson Centre’s Kennan Institute, Putin’s war in Ukraine continues his reign of criminality, but in more serious ways.
He told Express.co.uk: “In terms of criminal acts, the recent invasion of Ukraine and the brutality has implicated international law and potential criminal violations of international law.
“Dealing with crimes against humanity, waging an aggressive war, and possibly even genocide.
“Those are the kinds of criminal charges that confront Putin in the aftermath of this.”
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is investigating accusations of Russian war crimes in Ukraine.
Kyiv says it has identified more than 10,000 potential war crimes since Russia invaded the country on February 24.
Last month, Russian tank commander Vadim Shishimarin was jailed for life for killing a civilian at the first war crimes trial in Ukraine since the invasion began.
As Ukraine prepares other Russian soldiers to stand trial, experts claim to have found a chain of command directly linking atrocities on the battlefield to Putin himself.
Vladimir Putin backed by ‘network’ holding £3.7billion in assets, report claims [LATEST]
Groundhog Day: Britons as worried about living costs today as they were TEN YEARS ago [INSIGHT]
POLL: Do you support the unions in rail strikes bringing Britain to a halt? [ANALYSIS]
In his analysis of the Russian leader, Mr Pomeranz looked at other potential acts of criminality during Putin’s presidency.
The legal expert referred to jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny, Putin’s most vocal critic, who was found guilty of fraud in March and had a further nine years added to his two-and-a-half year sentence.
He said: “Clearly there has been rampant corruption in Russia that has gone unpunished.
“Putin has been able to use the courts to pursue his political enemies, such as Navalny, which has gone unpunished.
“Putin has obviously not observed even a modicum of a notion of the separation of powers initially described in the constitution.
“So, Putin’s actions as President, especially the invasion, invoke potential criminal responsibility.”
He added: “His other actions, if there was an independent legislature that could hold him responsible, that could be a possibility.
“But clearly there is not an independent legislature. And therefore, Putin would not be charged politically or criminally under the current regime.”
‘Putin: The New Tsar’ is available to stream on BBC iPlayer.
Source: Read Full Article